Keywords
parliamentarism
United States
polarization
constitutional reform
How to Cite
Abstract
In this inquiry, we analyze the characteristics of US presidentialism. Moreover, we use comparisons with parliamentary systems throughout the paper, in order emphasize the singularities of American exceptionalism. In addition to illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of each system, we accentuate the fact that the US President is both the Head of State and the Head of Government. Furthermore, Congress and the President are chosen separately, as a consequence of the separation of powers. Whilst, the former plays a pivotal role in the presidential election. Since the drafting of the US Constitution, more than two hundred years ago, no matter the outcome of the election, the electoral college has brought stability to the presidential system. In addition, the evolution of American democracy has been possible thanks to Constitutional Amendments. As such, the right to vote has evolved throughout the years without the need to draft a new Constitution. Nonetheless, the current polarization purports a threat to the American political systems since it could lead to a regime crisis of American presidentialism. Withal, if the president is to be chosen in a contingent election, Washington DC loses its representation, and state representation is reduced to a single vote per state. For these reasons, the US must undergo necessary changes to update its legal system to the democratic practices of the 21st century.
References
U.S. Code § 7. Legal Information Institute (LII). Cornell University Law School. Recuperado de https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/2/7
U.S. Code § 4. Legal Information Institute (LII). Cornell University Law School. Recuperado de https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/4
About Bernie (2020). Bernie Sanders. U.S. Senate for Vermont. Recuperado de https://www.sanders.senate.gov/about-bernie/
Abramowitz, A. I. y Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542-555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080493
Adkison, D. M. y Elliott, C. (1997). The Electoral college: a misunderstood institution. PS: Political Science & Politics, 30(1), 77-80. https://doi.org/10.2307/420676
The Biden Agenda for Women (2020). Biden Harris democrats. Recuperado de https://joebiden.com/womens-agenda/
Boller, P. F. (2004). Presidential campaigns: from George Washington to George W. Bush. New York: Oxford University Press.
Capitol riots: Congress certifies Joe Biden’s victory after chaotic scenes. (7-1-2021). BBC News. Recuperado de https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55568621
Casado Rodríguez, Y. (2016). Presidencia y liderazgo presidencial. En Y. Casado Rodríguez (Coord.). El sistema político de Estados Unidos (pp. 57-102). Madrid: Tecnos.
Constitución española. BOE, núm. 311, de 29 de diciembre de 1978. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/c/1978/12/27/(1)
Constitución de Francia, 1958, con enmiendas hasta 2008 (2021). Constitute. Recuperado de https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/France_2008.pdf?lang=es
The Constitution of the United States: a transcription (2021). National Archives. Recuperado de https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript
Corres-Illera, M. (2015). Leyes electorales y métodos de prorrateo en el Congreso de los Estados Unidos [Tesis Doctoral]. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Recuperado de http://eprints.ucm.es/34475/
Corres-Illera, M. (2016). Redacción y tramitación parlamentaria de la primera Ley Electoral en USA (1789). Historia Constitucional, 17, 45-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.17811/hc.v0i17.447
Corres-Illera, M. (2020). Leyes electorales y escaños constitucionales: matemática vs. política. Forum: Revista Departamento de Ciencia Política, 18, 166-195. https://doi.org/10.15446/frdcp.n18.79259
Dahl, R. A. (2003). How democratic is the American Constitution? New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dodd, L. C. y Oppenheimer, B. I. (2021). Congress reconsidered (12.a ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
Duverger, M. (1984). Which is the best electoral system? En A. Lijphart y B. Grofman (Eds.). Choosing An Electoral System: Issues and Alternatives (pp. 31-39). New York: Praeger.
Edwards, G. C. (2019). Why the electoral college is bad for America (3rd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300243888.001.0001
Ellis, C. R. y Ura, J. D. (2021). Polarization and the decline of economic voting in American national elections. Social Science Quarterly, 102(1), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12881
English, R. M. (2003). The United States Congress. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Exec. Order No. 13880, 84 Fed. Reg. 33821 (July 11, 2019). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/16/2019-15222/collecting-information-about-citizenship-status-in-connection-with-the-decennial-census
Exec. Order No. 13986, 86 Fed. Reg. 7015 (January 20, 2021). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/25/2021-01755/ensuring-a-lawful-and-accurate-enumeration-and-apportionment-pursuant-to-the-decennial-census
Foley, E. B. (2016). Ballot battles: the history of disputed elections in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ginsburg, R. B. (1974). The need for the Equal Rights Amendment: American Bar Association Journal, 59 (September, 1973), 1013-1019. Women Lawyers Journal, 0, 4-15.
Groenendyk, E., Sances, M. W. y Zhirkov, K. (2020). Intraparty polarization in American politics. The Journal of Politics, 82(4), 1616-1620. https://doi.org/10.1086/708780
Guardia Herrero, C. (2016). Partidos políticos y sistemas de partidos. En Y. Casado Rodríguez (Coord.). El sistema político de Estados Unidos (pp. 15-40). Madrid: Tecnos.
Hamilton, A. (2015a). El Federalista Número 51: Continuación y conclusión del mismo tema: frenos y equilibrios estructurales que resultan de combinar los principios republicanos con el sistema federal. The Independent Journal, 6 de febrero de 1788. En R. Máiz (Ed.). El Federalista (pp. 136-144). Madrid: Akal.
Hamilton, A. (2015b). El Federalista Número 68: La elección del presidente de la Unión. The Independent Journal, 12 de marzo de 1788. En R. Máiz (Ed.). El Federalista (pp. 136-144). Madrid: Akal.
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (2021a). The Global state of democracy report 2021: building resilience in a pandemic era. Stockholm: International IDEA. https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2021.91
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (2021b). Voter turnout database: United States. Stockholm: International IDEA. Recuperado de https://www.idea.int/data-tools/country-view/295/40
Li, M. (2021). The redistricting landscape 2021-22. New York: Brennan Center for Justice. Recuperado de https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/redistricting-landscape-2021-22
Madison, J. (2015). El Federalista Número 10: Continuación del mismo tema: la Unión como salvaguarda contra facciones internas e insurrecciones. The Daily Advertiser, 22 de noviembre de 1787. En R. Máiz (Ed.). El Federalista (pp. 136-144). Madrid: Akal.
Madison, J. et al. (2003). Debate on state equality in the Senate (June 28-July 2). En R. Ketchman (Ed.). The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (pp. 92- 109). New York: Signet Classic. (Publicación original 1787).
Miller, N. R. (2012). Election inversions by the U.S. Electoral College. En D. S. Felsenthal y M. Machover (Eds.). Electoral Systems (pp. 93-127). New York: Springer.
Peirce, N. R. y Longley, L. D. (1981). The people’s President: the electoral college in American history and the direct-vote alternative (ed. rev.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ramos Josa, P. F. (2016). Partidos políticos y sistemas de partidos. En Y. Casado Rodríguez (Coord.). El sistema político de Estados Unidos (pp. 127- 148). Madrid: Tecnos.
Ritchie, D. A. y JusticeLearning.org (2006). Our Constitution. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Roseboom, E. H. y Eckes, A. E. (1979). A History of presidential elections, from George Washington to Jimmy Carter (4.a ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Ross, T. (2004). The Electoral college: enlightened democracy. Executive summary. Legal Memorandum, 15. Washington D.C.: The Heritage Foundation. Recuperado de https://www.heritage.org/the-constitution/report/the-electoral-college-enlightened-democracy
Sartori, G. (1994). Neither presidentialism nor parliamentarism. En J. J. Linz y A. Valenzuela (Eds.). The Failure of presidential democracy (pp. 106-118). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sartori, G. (1997). Comparative constitutional engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes (2nd ed.). New York: New York University Press.
Schmidt, K. y Andrews, W. (19-12-2016). A Historic number of electors defected, and most were supposed to vote for Clinton. The New York Times. Recuperado de http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/19/us/elections/electoral-college-results.html
Tocqueville, A. (2009). La democracia en América (Vol. 1). Madrid: Alianza. (Original publicado 1835)
Torres-Soriano, M. R. (2017). Hackeando la democracia: operaciones de influencia en el ciberespacio. bie3: Boletín IEEE, 6, 826-839.
U.S. Census Bureau (2021). 2020 Census apportionment results. Recuperado de https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2020/dec/2020-apportionment-data.html
US judge reprimands Trump election fraud lawyers (26-8-2021). BBC News. Recuperado de https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58344982
Valdés, I. (9-6-2018). El día que la Constitución de Estados Unidos hizo llorar a Alyssa Milano. El País. Recuperado de https://elpais.com/elpais/2018/06/09/mujeres/1528541748_357789.html
Washington, G. (2008). Washington’s farewell address 1796. The Avalon Project: Documents in Law, History and Diplomacy. Recuperado de http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp
Wolley, J. y Peters, G. (2021). Statistics elections 2020. The American Presidency Project. Recuperado de https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/elections/2020
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Corres-Illera