Commentary on the judgments of the Constitutional Court 8/2024, of january 16, and 18/2024, of january 31: “Alberto Rodríguez case”
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

Keywords

principle of proportionality, criminal legality, analogy, extensive interpretation, constitutionality control

How to Cite

Ruiz Bursón, F. J. (2024). Commentary on the judgments of the Constitutional Court 8/2024, of january 16, and 18/2024, of january 31: “Alberto Rodríguez case”. Journal of the Basque Parliament, (5), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.47984/legal.2024.008

Abstract

The sentences analyzed have singular relevance in two aspects: the correct understanding of technicallegal concepts of a criminal nature, such as the principle of proportionality, analogy and extensive interpretation, as well as the analysis of the limits of the Constitutional Court in relation to the functions attributed to other powers of the State, especially the judicial and legislative.

https://doi.org/10.47984/legal.2024.008
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

References

Bacigalupo, E. (1994). Principios de derecho penal. Barcelona: Akal.

Castán, J. (1988). Derecho civil español, común y foral, tomo I. Madrid: Reus.

Ferrajoli, L. (2001). Derecho y razón, Teoría del garantismo penal. Madrid: Trotta.

Kelsen, H. (2016). La garantía jurisdiccional de la Constitución (la justicia constitucional). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Quintero Olivares, G. (2009). Parte General del Derecho penal. Cizur Mayor: Aranzadi.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Francisco Javier Ruiz Bursón

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.